Sunday, September 13, 2015

Dope

Dustin: 3.5 of 5 stars Nick: 3.5 of 5 stars Average: 3.5 of 5 stars (Live canary)

Dustin: Dope is a comedy about a black kid and his two best friends who are accused of trying to be white for getting good grades and aspiring to go to college. Shameik Moore stars as Malcolm, a boy living in a part of town known as “The Bottoms” with his single mother and one memory of his father from Nigeria. He is trying to get into Harvard, but doesn’t know how to stand out to the admissions committee. Through a string of misadventures, he ends up with a bag of a cocaine-like drug known as “Molly” and relies on the help of his two best friends to get rid of it.


Nick: The film has a very recognizable storyline while being shot in an original and fresh style, like Birdman, but not to that extent. All the expected things happen, but as the scenes played on the film continued to succeed in its wholly predictable story. Although the story is predictable, it’s also over-complicated for the time allotted. Dope should either have been less complicated and shortened or kept the complicated story, but added to it to where the characters can have the right amount of depth and elongated the running time.

Dustin: I liked the motley crew of characters. Malcolm and his two best friends, Jig and Diggy, are unlikely protagonists. Malcolm is an awkward, geeky black kid who sports a ‘90s-style flattop hairdo. Jig is his “14 percent black” Mexican friend, and Diggy is a lesbian often mistaken for a boy. They are obsessed with their idea of ‘90s pop culture and have a punk band with upbeat tunes that often play on the soundtrack. A lot of the secondary characters, though, feel a little more like types. There’s the Blood who is willing to kill Malcolm for his bag of dope, and the bystander witness who makes a spectacle of himself on the nightly news. But the originality and likeability of the main characters was like a breath of fresh air.

Nick: A$AP ROCKY was solid as Dom as well. An amusing thing I found out after the film was that the filmmaker, Rick Famuyiwa made my favorite “black” movie ever, The Wood. During Dope I kept thinking that the kids and the situations they get into reminded me of the flashback scenes in The Wood. Another film Dope reminds me of is Dear White People. They are not the same movie whatsoever, but they both have the geeky black teen who can’t get along with any other black kid and the ending message, which Dear White People actually deserved since it actually covered what the film was about. The last scene in Dope felt so out-of-place with its preachiness and self-congratulatory comments. The film doesn’t reach the depths that the last few comments made by Malcolm seem to think. Dear White People gets a lot closer to deserving it’s final statement.

Dustin: I agree with that sentiment. I don’t really get why the movie decided to climb onto the soapbox for the final few minutes. I think the movie got its point across without doing that, and the ending sort of diminished what came before, as that is what will be hanging in people’s minds as they walk out the theater.

There was another scene that also hit the wrong note entirely. This was when they were talking about how dangerous life is in the hood. A black kid gets shot while standing in line playing a Game Boy at a fast food restaurant. He’s in the wrong place at the wrong time. They show a blood-splattered Game Boy hit the floor, and during this tragic moment, they inserted a joke, and ran with it into the next shot. I didn’t feel like laughing, and even in a dark comedy, showing an innocent child get murdered isn’t funny.

Nick: I actually did laugh for a short moment but only because it was the original Game Boy and all my amazing and awful memories of that handheld device came flooding back. Dope sets up so many story lines that hardly ever get more than a mention. Malcolm is going to help his “dream-girl” study for her G.E.D. This is shown once and then at the very end she has passed. The main bad guy of the film, who is a rich and powerful type, has a daughter who becomes a viral video sensation for something illegal, is never shown getting flack for this even though he is publicly a good man who went to Harvard. Then, of course, is the Blood who you think is going to be the bad guy, but is then written off quickly and that storyline is completely gone. There are many small stories throughout the movie that makes it seem Dope would have worked better as a mini-series on HBO, where it could have seen out these storylines in a smoother fashion before adding more storylines that never get fulfilled.

Dustin: The movie definitely has an abundance of loose-ends, like you mentioned. In the hyperactive scene you just alluded to, the rich guy’s daughter ODs on “Molly” and ends up running across a busy street to pee in some bushes. Malcolm, who was in the car with her, is late for his Harvard alum interview, and basically steals her car and abandons her. Her brother, who was meanwhile getting shot in the leg, is in a high-speed police pursuit and sees Malcolm as he passes him. Yet, we never learn the consequences or outcome of any of this. We never learn what happens to Dom in jail, and apparently no one ever asks Malcolm for the $100,000 some dollars he made selling the dope, or for the dope itself. He lives in an environment where people are killed for no reason, but himself is immune to consequences and even ends up at Harvard.

Nick: Don’t forget that Malcolm’s physique is one of an athletic teen instead of one whose only exercise is biking around between school and home. It’s also shocking he doesn’t have a job. He wants to get into Harvard, yet he doesn’t have a job and his mom works as a bus driver. So his only hope is to get a full-ride from Harvard or be in some major debt in the future if he actually gets accepted. You would also assume he would have many extra curriculars and or doing charity in order to put it on his application. He seems like an entitled kid who just wants things to be given to him instead of working toward the goal he desires. Which actually does fit the plot of the movie, but by the end with his preachiness on the soap box it ruins most of what he might have learned having to clean up a situation for himself.

Dustin: I didn’t really think of that, but now that you mention it, Malcolm’s life does seem at odds with the world of the movie. He does come off as a privileged kid. Band equipment isn’t cheap. He lives in a decent house rather than a low-income housing project. And he devotes a lot of time (and, presumably money) to following obscure interests--something that’s usually associated with the upper-middle class. Come to think of it, his teenage years were probably better than mine growing up in the whitebread suburbs.

Nick: One of the many things I enjoyed were the scenes with Blake Anderson (Workaholics).  Mostly the ones where he tries to convince them that he should be allowed to say the N word in an affectionate way towards his friends like all of them do towards each other. The N word is mentioned in an almost countless capacity to the extent he might have a point, but of course in only in an affectionate manner!

Dustin: I enjoyed most of the movie and came to like the characters. There were some miscalculations and too many loose-ends, but overall, it was an entertaining and original film.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

American Ultra

Dustin: 3 of 5 stars Nick: 3 of 5 stars Average: 3 of 5 stars (Woozy canary)

Dustin: ‘Murican Ultra is a spy thriller/stoner comedy genre mashup. The plot echoes Doug Liman’s The Bourne Identity, but set in the fictional backwoods of Liman, West Virginia. Mike (Jesse Eisenberg) is a CIA “asset” who has been trained to brutally murder people with everyday objects. ‘Topher Grace is a yuppie agent bent on killing Mike for no reason other than he’s a “security risk.” Mike and his girlfriend Phoebe (Kristen Stewart) are on the run from the CIA as the government wantonly kills every American citizen who in the area.


Nick: American Ultra is a lively film that can be considered an amalgamation of all other films of the same genre. While not being nearly as good as it could have been, Eisenberg and Stewart are enjoyable to watch as the stoner lovers who just want to leave town together (Harold and Kumar). The two main actors had great chemistry, and I couldn’t shake the idea that this was a sequel to Adventureland.

Dustin: This basically followed the same premise as The Bourne Identity. They are both about an “asset” or “agent” suffering from a fictional mental condition (a form of amnesia in Bourne that acts as a kind of factory-reset for his brain, and mental programming in American Ultra). Both are being hunted by the CIA while they are running blind with no understanding of what’s happening to them.

The way other critics are discussing American Ultra is a lot like how I see the Bourne movies. Unlikely plots with CIA assassins being graphically killed off with everyday items. I liked American Ultra as a parody of Bourne, but I wish they would have committed to that idea a little better.

Nick: That seems to be the general consensus. The film tries a bit of everything, but never commits to any genre. This never bothered me, though I do admit it could have been a lot of better if it did so. The film has been getting many negative reviews with the average reviewer saying it was uneven and the characters one-dimensional. I think these people weren’t aware that American Ultra is more of a comedy, and in comedies characters are often one dimensional. It’s normally something that isn’t brought up when discussing comedies, but is the one constant I found when reading other reviews. As in all comedies I’m able to let it slide if I’m enjoying myself, and I did that and more. I had a great time, but I know comedies are often the most disagreed upon films between viewers because we all have our own brand of humor. Sandler!!!

Dustin: I didn’t think this movie was uneven. It established a tone and pretty much stuck with it. But if this was supposed to work as a Bourne parody, there wasn’t much indicating that. I think most people would miss the name of the fictional town was from the director of the first Bourne movie (I’m not counting the ‘80s TV movie). I’m still not sure if we saw a spoof or homage. I would have liked a little more wink-wink-nudge that they were doing a Bourne parody, the way the Austin Powers movies brilliantly satire the Bond films.

Nick: The secondary characters were pretty useless beyond Walton Goggins and John Leguizamo. Goggins as the arsassin (arsonist/assassin) and Leguizamo as the drug/firework dealer are the reason the film kept in the realm of comedy when the other characters were so bland and played it straight. Topher Grace, Connie Britton and Bill Pullman could have been played by less recognizable faces considering the lack of depth they had to achieve. I love seeing all three of these actors, but the parts would have been better served if they were somewhat more comedic or in the film less or not at all. More than anything I love seeing Tony Hale, and his comedic scenes were perfect, but he was also an unnecessary piece in this jumbled puzzle of pointlessness.

Dustin: The movie did well as a comedy. Most of the jokes landed, but I admit I was bored during the expository scenes. That could have to do with the one-dimensionality of the characters, or just that it all felt a little too familiar, being a Bourne identical.

Nick: I actually love the Bourne trilogy because of the action and the characters, and I think it led to the revitalization of the Bond series as their action is more parkour and all the characters are more well-rounded. I would never argue that they show a realistic side to spycraft or someone suffering amnesia, but they did all the other facets to a certain degree that caring about truth seems ridiculous these days when talking about a Hollywood film franchise. I would of course rather have it be as real as possible, but then that would upset the fan base of the books, which I’ve heard are as close as they come to being a true adaptation. Damn you I Am Legend!!!

Dustin: The Bourne books and movies are nothing alike. They just share titles and the basic premise of a former assassin who has amnesia. The first book had a fun premise, and they do well creating an atmosphere. But the second two are worthless lumps of concrete. To the movies’ credit, they are actually better than the books.

Nick: The last thing I’ll say is that I hated the first scene! I closed my eyes and refused to watch. It shows the entire film in a quick flashback starting with Eisenberg in jail as he remembers what led him to this point. It’s a useless gimmick that is there because it looks cool, but adds absolutely nothing to the story. Are we not already in the theater because we are curious as to what happens so we don’t need a quick trailer in the film before we see the movie? It did make me think of the time I went to a brand new theater to see A Million Ways to Die in the West and they played the trailer for the movie before the show started! That is hopefully a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

The Man from U.N.C.L.E.

Dustin: 4 of 5 stars Nick: 4 of 5 stars Average: 4 of 5 stars (Live canary)

Dustin: The Man from U.N.C.L.E. brings the silly 1960s TV series to the big screen as a silly movie. It stars British actor Henry Cavill as CIA agent Napoleon Solo, American actor Armie Hammer as KGB agent Illya Kuryakin and Swedish actress Alicia Vikander (Ex Machina) as German mechanic Gaby.


Nick: Do you think Henry Cavill impressed enough to get that future Bond role?

Dustin: Yeah, I cynically mentioned before this movie this was “Henry Cavill’s James Bond audition.” But after seeing it, I wouldn’t say that. He looked every bit like Bond, but his character reminded me a lot of Roger Moore, with the cool, affected delivery and tongue-in-cheek attitude throughout. I think he played Napoleon Solo, not James Bond-wannabe.

The movie is about Solo and Illya, agents of opposite forces tasked with finding a female mechanic named Gaby. Solo has to get Gaby out of East Germany so she can help the CIA find her nuke-building Nazi father. Illya has to stop Solo, using lethal force if necessary. Once the CIA and KGB learn the nuke is near completion, they force Solo and Illya to team up and work with Gaby to find her father.

Nick: The movie was well paced and every scene at least had a modicum of action or comedy, which helped set the tone throughout. The audience seemed to laugh at every joke, and the action was shot in some unique ways that gave this cinephile a cinerection! Guy Ritchie hasn’t made a film I have liked since Snatch (which I love) but he did The Man From U.N.C.L.E. proud.

Dustin: I haven’t seen the old TV series, but I’d like to so I can compare Cavill’s performance to the character played by Robert Vaughn. I was a little taken out of the movie by Cavill’s approach, but I can’t deny it wasn’t unique, and I think I’d appreciate it more if I knew he was being true to the source material.

I really liked Ritchie’s writing and direction here. The style, substance, lighting and framing all resembled 1960s psychedelic films. But the movie is a little too self-aware and the production is too amped up to be a ‘60s film. I’d call it a ‘60s-style movie with a postmodern sensibility.

Nick: While Cavill’s portrayal of Solo took me out of the film as well, he just happened to be my favorite part. Every remark and smirk made me think of an homage to classic spy films where the American is always just so goddamn cool, like the scene where he hops on a truck after falling off a boat Illya is driving and he finds red wine and a sandwich in a basket. While his temporary ally is being chased around he enjoys that fine random meal that some Italian henchman is going to regret leaving in his car later. (I wish that was an after-credits scene.)

Dustin: That was one of my favorite scenes as well, and when I finally warmed up to Cavill. That’s pretty much exactly what I would have done in that situation, so I was able to relate then.

We both talked about the early scene in Blaul Part: Mall Cop 2 where his grandma gets hit by a truck and it is supposed to be funny. I gave an objective reason why it wasn’t funny. You said it would have been funny in a dark comedy. Here we both laughed pretty hard when a man gets electrocuted to death. This movie establishes its tone effectively and delivers some good dark humor.

Nick: Another thing that caught my attention was how sexuality was suggested rather than shown. There is quite a bit of sex going on behind the scenes, and there is a nice side-boob shot, but there is no sex scene and none of the main characters end up sleeping together (a spy staple). Though it did come pretty close when Solo and Illya argue about what is considered high fashion for a woman. I really thought they were going to be gay after that scene. They both argued so vehemently over the topic. I guess they just really know their stuff.

Dustin: We don’t see the sex scene between Solo and the bad chick, but we sort of hear it. It was more of a comedic bit than a character-developing plot point. That was another scene I really enjoyed.

Anything else to add?

Nick: Tupac is alive and in witness protection!

Dustin: In that case, I’ll just say The Man from U.N.C.L.E. is a stylish, comedic and entertaining throw-back to Cold War-era spy films. I recommend seeing it when it opens this Friday.

Shaun the Sheep Movie

Dustin: 4.5 of 5 stars Nick: 4 of 5 stars Average: 4.25 of 5 stars (Live canary)

Dustin: Shaun the Sheep Movie brings the beloved BBC claymation shorts to the big screen. After the sheep’s antics cause their farmer to end up in the Big City with memory loss, Shaun the Sheep and Bitzer the Dog lead a team of plucky sheep to rescue their farmer.


Nick: I’ve never seen the show, but the movie is virtually flawless. I say “virtually” because the only thing that can be considered a flaw is that it’s aimed at children, which is obvious when the doctor writes on his sheet “Memory Loss” instead of “amnesia” or some other term for a certain type of memory loss. Though it might be aimed at children, adults will still find the whole movie enjoyable and worth repeated viewings. This might alleive some parents from having to watch Frozen yet again--that is once it comes out on DVD.

Dustin: I discovered Shaun the Sheep maybe a year ago through my daughter. She tends to get her hands on her mom’s Kindle Fire and somehow finds these videos on YouTube (the 2-year-old clearly understands the technology better than me). She was watching them all the time and saying “Sha-sheep, baaaaa!” So I thought, What is this crap? and watched some of the videos with her, like a responsible parent. I’m sure I can think of other instances where I’ve been a responsible parent, too. I immediately found the show charming, and eagerly took her to see this movie opening weekend.

I praise the movie for being able to keep a 2-year-old’s attention for almost 90 minutes. For adults, it is a work of art. I am getting burned out on all the computer-animated films of the past 20 years, so seeing a good ol’ fashioned claymation film was like a breath of fresh air.

Nick: All the comedic bits in the movie ranged from amusing to hilarious. My favorite involves the crazy-eyed dog in the pound who won’t stop eyeing down Bitzer, and during the credits there is another funny bit involving the dog! Another one would be when Shaun is trying to get a duck to help him with something, but has to bribe him first. The scene is shot like a drug deal, but its contents are pieces of bread. The duck looks through each piece and he demands more for whatever his undertaking is, and Shaun proceeds to take one more piece that he had hidden and puts it in the pile.

Dustin: The movie is charming throughout. Something about the appearance of the sheep just puts a smile on your face, and you’re in a mood to laugh. Even the lowest-common-denominator jokes get a chuckle, where the same joke would get a frown or a groan if it were in the new Vacation movie.

Nick: I think because when a character farts in this movie the reaction by Shaun is yuck, but then he gets on with whatever action his character was undertaking. If that was in a movie like Vacation the actor would make obscene faces and the farts would be drawn out and played for the most laughs (when they don’t realize that less is more--sometimes).

Dustin: My only criticism is the plot felt over familiar, although I can’t quite recall a movie with a similar plot, I felt like I had seen it before and knew where it was heading. But as a device to deliver amusing sight gags to children, it works.

Nick: It was stupendous, and I’ll probably see it again within the week. I wish the sheep were drawn a little different from one another. Only Shaun and the baby stood out, every other sheep was background, which is fine, but since they show up throughout the whole film I think it would have been better to differentiate them more.

Dustin: Apparently all the sheep have names. I think they looked different enough. I can’t tell one real sheep from another.

Nick: But it’s an animated film and reality is not what is strived for! I assumed all the sheep have names and so did the dog on the show, but I had no clue his name was Bitzer until you mentioned it earlier. I’m guessing there was a food bowl with his name or something.

Dustin: It was in the opening “credits.” I didn’t know the dog’s name until then.

I’d recommend this movie to kids, families and lonely adults (sorry!). Kids deserve movies that don’t treat them like mindless sheep who’ll be happy with anything. That’s why I wholeheartedly recommend Shaun the Sheep Movie.

Thursday, August 6, 2015

Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation

Dustin: 3.5 of 5 stars Nick: 3.5 of 5 stars Average: 3.5 of 5 stars (Live canary)


Dustin: Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation is about International Monetary Fund secret agent Tom Cruise, who must circumnavigate the globe for action to happen. Director Christopher McQuarrie said, “Action!” and action just happened. Some action leads to other action. The plot was almost as hard to follow as Incoherent Vice. I can explain the overall story, but I had a hard time following it, not always sure why we were in a new location, what Tom Cruise was trying to accomplish during the underwater level.



Nick: Hunt (hard H sound) went to those new locations because that is where the Syndicate would be on their next mission. The underwater scene was pretty silly. They have all this tactical armor, but they don’t have a piece of equipment to help extend your stay underwater? But it was fun…


Dustin: The movie was basically about Tom Cruise trying to prove the existence of a secret organization, the specter-like Syndicate. He teams up with an MI6 agent who is under deep cover within the Syndicate, and together they are trying to destroy it.


I guess I shouldn’t complain about realism in a movie like this, but I was wondering what a British guy (Simon Pegg) was doing working at CIA headquarters. This wasn’t a comedy like Spy, where you could overlook Jason Statham’s presence there. I also laughed when Alec Baldwin criticised the IMF for doing the sort of things the CIA does.


Nick: I recently showed Team America: World Police to someone who had never even heard of the movie! Alec Baldwin’s pleas to the council reminded me of one of Alec Baldwin’s many speeches in TA:WP. In other words I laughed whenever he was on screen.  


Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol was such a fantastic action film it’s hard not to compare this semi-lacklustre film to its predecessor. I don’t think any aspect of the film is equal to or better than M:I-GP. There was a great comedy bit of Tom Cruise being forced into action after being dead for a minute. He is forced to drive a car in a high speed pursuit but keeps crashing into everything as Simon Pegg sits shotgun freaking out about the whole situation. Immediately after the car chase, Hunt jumps onto a motorcycle and is able to ride it without fault, and although it was a very entertaining scene I’m a little wary about the amount of sense it makes. Wouldn’t he still be a shitty driver but on a much more dangerous vehicle?


Did that make sense? I haven’t had my coffee yet


Dustin: Makes more sense than the movie.

The reason huge stars like Cruise are cast in movies like these is because we’re supposed to think this is happening to Tom Cruise--it doesn’t matter what the character’s name is--and therefore we’re supposed to care more.


Having said that, I actually like Tom Cruise. He certainly gets a lot of undeserved hate for jumping on Oprah’s couch 10 years ago. It’s hard to believe he’s 53. I’m 21 years younger than him, but my body more closely resembles a 53-year-old’s, while his looks more like mine in my mid-20s (feels so long ago). He also has a young face. I think he could continue being action man for a few more years. I wouldn’t say he has a wide range, though. He’s always Tom Cruise (except for his brilliant role in Tropic Thunder).


Nick: I actually loved it when he jumped on that couch because celebrities normally have PR people to control them, but he was like, Fuck it, I’m jumping on this goddamn couch! Interviews with celebs are often boring, simple answers that make the celeb more endearing, but not that interview--it still gets brought up 10 years after the incident. That’s pretty crazy!


I was kind of upset about Jeremy Renner’s whittled down role. He was awesome in the last one and his character’s story was great, but here he seems like Hawkeye: a pretty useless member of the team.


Dustin: Like you said, the movie was pretty fun. It reminded me of a Pierce Brosnan-era Bond film. A little over-the-top and contrived, but chock-full of imaginative action set-pieces.